Skip to content
Let's Talk

Industrial robots & automation Market ResearchCase 01 of 10

Why small manufacturers hesitate to adopt industrial robots

An industrial robotics company

  • RegionPune, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ludhiana & Rajkot
  • Scope40 interviews, 450 survey responses
  • Timeline8 weeks
  • MarketsIndia
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping industrial robots & automation

Industrial automation and robotics are moving from large plants to mid-sized manufacturers. Adoption depends on clear payback, integrator support and confidence in the technology.

  • Plant heads need a clear business case before investing
  • System integrators are central to successful adoption
  • Skills gaps slow down deployment
02

Client background

An industrial robotics company, working in Pune, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ludhiana & Rajkot. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
An industrial robotics company
Sector
Industrial robots & automation
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Business panel, Qualitative research, Quantitative research
03

Client challenge

Robot adoption was growing among large automotive plants but remained rare in small and mid-sized factories. The company wanted to understand what held these manufacturers back and how to make automation feel achievable.

04

Research objectives

  • Answer the core question: why small manufacturers hesitate to adopt industrial robots.
  • Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 8 weeks.
05

Target audience

Scope: 40 interviews, 450 survey responses.

Audiences we typically reach in industrial robots & automation

Plant heads and ownersProduction engineersSystem integratorsAutomation distributorsMaintenance teams

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: Pune, Chennai, Coimbatore, Ludhiana & Rajkot. Market: India.

  • India
07

Research methodology

A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Plant owner interviews
  3. 3Telephone survey
  4. 4Insight

We first interviewed owners and plant heads at small factories in machining, welding and packaging clusters, exploring their experiences with automation, labour challenges and investment decisions. A telephone survey then measured how common each barrier was, segmented by industry and company size.

Business panelQualitative researchQuantitative research

08

Sampling strategy

  • Business respondents were screened on role, company size and involvement in the decision before being invited.
  • Online respondents were drawn from verified panel members who matched the screening criteria, with quotas on key profile attributes.
  • Telephone contacts were dialled from verified lists, with quotas tracked live by the field team.
  • Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
09

Data collection

interviews
40
survey responses
450
Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 8-week timeline.
  • Telephone interviews were run from our CATI centre, with calls monitored for quality.
  • The online survey was mobile-friendly and offered in respondents' languages.
  • Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Live call monitoring and recording review
  • Call-back verification
  • Digital fingerprinting and duplicate checks
  • Attention, speed and straight-lining checks
  • Review of open-ended answers
  • Recordings and transcripts for every session
  • Re-screening of qualitative recruits
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
  • Journey and decision mapping
12

Key findings

  • Owners were less worried about robot prices than about downtime during installation, lack of in-house skills and uncertainty about payback.
  • Early pilots were placed with owners who had taken part in the research, which gave the company real case examples for other factories in the same clusters.
Reducing perceived risk mattered more than reducing the price.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: reducing perceived risk mattered more than reducing the price.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: owners were less worried about robot prices than about downtime during installation, lack of in-house skills and uncertainty about payback.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The company introduced fixed-price pilot cells with guaranteed installation timelines, operator training and a simple payback calculator for its sales team.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Interview summaries and key verbatims
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: what stops plants from automating?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More industrial robots & automation case studies

  1. 02caseSizing the market for collaborative robots in Indian factoriesA global automation company entering India
  2. 03caseUnderstanding what system integrators need from a robot brandAn industrial robot manufacturer
  3. 04caseHow automation changes jobs on the factory floorA skills and labour research foundation
All industrial robots & automation case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert