Industry overview
What is shaping electronics
Consumer electronics and appliance buyers research online, compare prices across channels and judge brands on after-sales service as much as on features.
- Purchase journeys blend online research and in-store demos
- E-commerce and modern retail compete on price and delivery
- After-sales service drives repeat purchase
Client background
A television and audio brand, working in 15 cities across Germany, France, Italy & Spain. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.
- Organisation
- A television and audio brand
- Sector
- Electronics
- Team engaged
- Market Research
- Services
- Offline data collection, Reporting & insights, Data analytics & dashboards
Client challenge
The brand invested in in-store promoters and displays at electronics chains but suspected that sales staff often steered shoppers towards competing brands with better incentives.
Research objectives
- Deliver on the brief: mystery shopping large-format electronics stores.
- Produce results that can be compared across groups and locations.
- Set up a repeatable measure the client can track over time.
Target audience
Scope: 600 store visits per wave.
Audiences we typically reach in electronics
Appliance and device buyersOwners and usersRetailers and sales staffE-commerce shoppersService technicians
Geographic coverage
Coverage: 15 cities across Germany, France, Italy & Spain. Markets: Germany, France, Italy and Spain. 600 store visits covered.
- Germany
- France
- Italy
- Spain
Research methodology
A structured quantitative design, so results could be compared across groups, locations and time.
- 1Brief
- 2Mystery shopping visits
- 3Store-level scorecards
- 4Insight
Trained mystery shoppers posed as customers looking for a new television, recording which brands were recommended, how well features were explained, display condition and promoter presence. Each visit was scored consistently and results were shared as store scorecards. Shoppers followed a consistent script, and a share of visits were repeated by a second shopper to check that scoring was reliable.
Offline data collectionReporting & insightsData analytics & dashboards
Sampling strategy
- Respondents were selected across 15 cities across Germany, France, Italy & Spain using quotas set in advance for each location and respondent type, so no single area or group dominated.
Data collection
- Trained local-language interviewers conducted interviews in person, supervised in the field.
- Auditors and mystery shoppers followed a standard checklist, recording evidence at each visit.
Data quality & validation
- Back-checks on a share of completed interviews
- Time and location checks on field interviews
- Supervisor accompaniment in the field
- Photo or document evidence for audit points
- Second-reviewer checks on scores
- Logic and range checks on the final data
- Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
Data analysis
- Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
- Significance testing on the differences that mattered
- Interactive dashboard for ongoing tracking
Key findings
- Recommendations depended heavily on promoter presence and the incentives offered by chains.
Measuring what happens on the shop floor revealed the real return on promotional spending.
Recommendations
- The brand redesigned its incentive structure, improved product training and focused promoter coverage on the highest-traffic stores.
- Share the findings with the teams closest to customers so they can act quickly.
What we recommended, and the client put into practice
Business impact
- Store-level scores in the following wave showed recommendations improving in stores where promoters had received the new training.
Deliverables & next steps
- Insight report and management presentation
- Cleaned data file and data tables
- Interactive dashboard
- Continue the routine and review results every period.
- A natural follow-on question: how does a new product perform in real homes?
Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.