Skip to content
Let's Talk

Semiconductor Market ResearchCase 04 of 10

Gathering industry views on semiconductor incentive policies

An industry association

  • RegionIndia
  • Scope80 member companies, 20 interviews
  • Timeline6 weeks
  • MarketsIndia
Download the PDF Discuss a similar project
01

Industry overview

What is shaping semiconductor

The semiconductor and electronics manufacturing ecosystem is expanding, bringing new fabs, design centres and suppliers. Talent, supplier readiness and policy support decide its pace.

  • New manufacturing capacity needs a local supplier base
  • Design and fab talent is in high demand
  • Policy incentives shape investment decisions
02

Client background

An industry association, working in India. Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

Organisation
An industry association
Sector
Semiconductor
Team engaged
Market Research
Services
Government research, Business panel, Reporting & insights
03

Client challenge

The association needed structured evidence from members on incentive schemes, approval processes and infrastructure needs, to inform its policy submissions. Individual companies had raised concerns informally, but policymakers asked for structured, representative evidence rather than anecdotes.

04

Research objectives

  • Deliver on the brief: gathering industry views on semiconductor incentive policies.
  • Understand the views, needs and behaviour of member companies.
  • Measure how widespread each pattern is, and explain the reasons behind it.
  • Give the client evidence it can act on within 6 weeks.
05

Target audience

The work focused on 80 member companies.

  • member companies80

Audiences we typically reach in semiconductor

Design and manufacturing companiesComponent suppliersEngineers and studentsB2B buyersIndustry bodies

06

Geographic coverage

Coverage: India. Market: India.

  • India
07

Research methodology

A mixed-method design: structured research measured how widespread each pattern was, and qualitative conversations explained why.

  1. 1Brief
  2. 2Structured member survey
  3. 3Executive interviews
  4. 4Insight

We surveyed member companies about investment plans, incentive experiences and barriers, and interviewed senior executives in depth. Responses were confidential and reported in aggregate. Questions were designed with the association’s policy team so that results would map directly onto the specific scheme provisions under discussion.

Government researchBusiness panelReporting & insights

08

Sampling strategy

member companies
80
  • Business respondents were screened on role, company size and involvement in the decision before being invited.
  • Online respondents were drawn from verified panel members who matched the screening criteria, with quotas on key profile attributes.
  • Qualitative participants were recruited purposively to cover the full range of experiences that mattered, rather than for statistical representation.
09

Data collection

interviews
20
Brief & design Sampling & set-up Fieldwork Analysis Reporting Indicative split of the 6-week timeline.
  • The online survey was mobile-friendly and offered in respondents' languages.
  • Interviews and discussions were led by experienced moderators using a guide agreed with the client.
10

Data quality & validation

  • Digital fingerprinting and duplicate checks
  • Attention, speed and straight-lining checks
  • Review of open-ended answers
  • Recordings and transcripts for every session
  • Re-screening of qualitative recruits
  • Logic and range checks on the final data
  • Work carried out under our ISO 20252 quality procedures
11

Data analysis

  • Cross-tabulation by key groups and locations
  • Significance testing on the differences that mattered
  • Thematic coding of interviews and discussions
  • Journey and decision mapping
12

Key findings

  • Approval timelines and reliable utilities were the top concerns.
  • The association’s submission included specific, evidence-based recommendations on both.
Aggregated, confidential responses gave the association credible evidence to present.
13

Recommendations

  • Build on the core insight: aggregated, confidential responses gave the association credible evidence to present.
  • Focus effort where the evidence was strongest: approval timelines and reliable utilities were the top concerns.
  • Re-measure after the changes to confirm the effect.
14

Business impact

  • The survey was repeated a year later to track whether members’ experiences had changed after policy updates, giving the association evidence over time.

What changed in the business as a result of the work. Impact is described qualitatively.

15

Deliverables & next steps

  • Insight report and management presentation
  • Cleaned data file and data tables
  • Evaluation findings with programme recommendations
  • Repeat the measure after changes are in place to track progress.
  • A natural follow-on question: what do B2B buyers need from local suppliers?

Client identity is withheld to protect confidentiality.

More semiconductor case studies

  1. 01caseMapping the talent pipeline for semiconductor design and manufacturingA state electronics and semiconductor mission
  2. 02caseHow global chip companies choose design service partnersA semiconductor design services company
  3. 03caseAssessing local supply chains for a chip assembly and test facilityAn outsourced semiconductor assembly and test company
All semiconductor case studies

Want results like these?

Tell us about your objectives. We'll recommend an approach and confirm feasibility within one working day.

Request a QuoteTalk to an Expert